The prime myth is that all photographs of child nudity are illegal. This is no longer in the background but considered a specific "fact." In early April, Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post left no doubt: "Nude photos of minors -- even if the minor is you --are child pornography." Not only is there no basis for that absurdity in jurisprudence in North America, it maligns family snapshots as well as photos in the arts, medicine or naturism; and it declares the sole purpose of a lack of clothes to be immoral, harmful sexuality.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Debunking Myths About Child Nudity
Must reading from Dr. Paul Rapoport.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment